Paper detail

Extension of Stanley's Theorem for Partitions

In this paper we present an extension of Stanley's theorem related to partitions of positive integers. Stanley's theorem states a relation between "the sum of the numbers of distinct members in the partitions of a positive integer $n$" and "the total number of 1's that occur in the partitions of $n$". Our generalization states a similar relation between "the sum of the numbers of distinct members in the partitions of $n$" and the total number of 2's or 3's or any general $k$ that occur in the partitions of $n$ and the subsequent integers. We also apply this result to obtain an array of interesting corollaries, including alternate proofs and analogues of some of the very well-known results in the theory of partitions. We extend Ramanujan's results on congruence behavior of the 'number of partition' function $p(n)$ to get analogous results for the 'number of occurrences of an element $k$ in partitions of $n$'. Moreover, we present an alternate proof of Ramanujan's results in this paper.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.