Paper detail

Extension of Laguerre polynomials with negative arguments

We consider the irreducibility of polynomial $L_n^{(α)} (x) $ where $α$ is a negative integer. We observe that the constant term of $L_n^{(α)} (x) $ vanishes if and only if $n \geq |α| = -α$. Therefore we assume that $α= -n-s-1$ where $s$ is a non-negative integer. Let $$ g(x) = (-1)^n L_n^{(-n-s-1)}(x) = \sum\limits_{j=0}^{n} a_j \frac{x^j}{j!} $$ and more general polynomial, let $$ G(x) = \sum\limits_{j=0}^{n} a_j b_j \frac{x^j}{j!} $$ where $b_j$ with $0 \leq j \leq n$ are integers such that $|b_0| = |b_n| = 1$. Schur was the first to prove the irreducibility of $g(x)$ for $s=0$. It has been proved that $g(x)$ is irreducibile for $0 \leq s \leq 60$. In this paper, by a different method, we prove : Apart from finitely many explicitely given posibilities, either $G(x)$ is irreducible or $G(x)$ is linear factor times irreducible polynomial. This is a consequence of the estimate $s > 1.9 k$ whenever $G(x)$ has a factor of degree $k \geq 2$ and $(n,k,s) \neq (10,5,4)$. This sharpens earlier estimates of Shorey and Tijdeman and Nair and Shorey.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.