Paper detail

Extending Flat Motion Planning to Non-flat Systems. Experiments on Aircraft Models Using Maple

Aircraft models may be considered as flat if one neglects some terms associated to aerodynamics. Computational experiments in Maple show that in some cases a suitably designed feed-back allows to follow such trajectories, when applied to the non-flat model. However some maneuvers may be hard or even impossible to achieve with this flat approximation. In this paper, we propose an iterated process to compute a more achievable trajectory, starting from the flat reference trajectory. More precisely, the unknown neglected terms in the flat model are iteratively re-evaluated using the values obtained at the previous step. This process may be interpreted as a new trajectory parametrization, using an infinite number of derivatives, a property that may be called \emph{generalized flatness}. We illustrate the pertinence of this approach in flight conditions of increasing difficulties, from single engine flight, to aileron roll.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.