Paper detail

Extending Concurrent Separation Logic to Enhance Modular Formalization

Nowadays, numerous services based on large-scale distributed systems have been developed to boost the convenience of human life. On the other side, it becomes a significant challenge to ensure the correctness and properties of these systems due to the complex and nested architecture. Although concurrent separation logic (CSL) has partially tackled the problem by specifying systems and verifying the correctness of them, it faces modularity issues. In this paper, we propose an extended concurrent separation logic (ECSL) to address the modularity issues of CSL with the support of the temporal extension, communication extension, environment extension, and nest extension. ECSL is capable of formalizing systems at different abstraction levels from memory management to architecture and protocol design with great modularity. Furthermore, we stick to unitarity and compatibility principles while developing ECSL.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.