Paper detail

Extended formulations, non-negative factorizations and randomized communication protocols

An extended formulation of a polyhedron $P$ is a linear description of a polyhedron $Q$ together with a linear map $π$ such that $π(Q)=P$. These objects are of fundamental importance in polyhedral combinatorics and optimization theory, and the subject of a number of studies. Yannakakis' factorization theorem [M. Yannakakis. Expressing combinatorial optimization problems by linear programs. {\em J. Comput. System Sci.}, 43(3):441--466 (1991)] provides a surprising connection between extended formulations and communication complexity, showing that the smallest size of an extended formulation of $P$ equals the nonnegative rank of its slack matrix $S$. Moreover, Yannakakis also shows that the nonnegative rank of $S$ is at most $2^c$, where $c$ is the complexity of any \emph{deterministic} protocol computing $S$. In this paper, we show that the latter result can be strengthened when we allow protocols to be \emph{randomized}. In particular, we prove that the base-2 logarithm of the nonnegative rank of any nonnegative matrix equals the minimum complexity of a randomized communication protocol computing the matrix in expectation. Using Yannakakis' factorization theorem, this implies that the base-2 logarithm of the smallest size of an extended formulation of a polytope $P$ equals the minimum complexity of a randomized communication protocol computing the slack matrix of $P$ in expectation. We show that allowing randomization in the protocol can be crucial for obtaining small extended formulations. Specifically, we prove that for the spanning tree and perfect matching polytopes, small variance in the protocol forces large size in the extended formulation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.