Paper detail

Extended formulation and valid inequalities for the multi-item inventory lot-sizing problem with supplier selection

We consider the multi-item inventory lot-sizing problem with supplier selection. The problem consists of determining an optimal purchasing plan in order to satisfy dynamic deterministic demands for multiple items over a finite planning horizon, considering that multiple suppliers are available to purchase from. As the complexity of the problem was an open question, we show that it is NP-hard. We propose a facility location extended formulation for the problem which can be preprocessed based on the cost structure and describe new valid inequalities in the original space of variables. Furthermore, we study the projection of the extended formulation into the original space and show the connection between the inequalities generated by this projection and the newly proposed inequalities. Additionally, we present a simple and easy to implement yet very effective MIP (mixed integer programming) heuristic using the extended formulation. Besides, we introduce two new benchmark sets of instances to assess the performance of the approaches under different cost structures. Computational results show that the preprocessing approach can significantly reduce the size of the formulation to be solved, allowing both an increase in the number of instances solved to optimality within the time limit and a reduction on the average time to solve them. Moreover, the described inequalities can improve the performance of a standard formulation for nearly all instance groups. They can also be used to provide strong lower bounds for certain large instances for which the preprocessed facility location formulation fails even to provide a linear relaxation bound due to memory limitations. Furthermore, the proposed MIP heuristic outperforms the heuristics available in the literature as it obtains solution values which at least match those reported for all instance groups, strictly improving most of them.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.