Paper detail

Exponential growth of the number density of massive early-type galaxies

We determine the evolution of the co-moving density of the most massive ($M_* \geq 10^{12} M_\odot$) early-type galaxy population in the redshift range of $z = 0.15$ - 0.45 in different stellar mass ranges using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 (SDSS DR7) catalog. We find that the co-moving number density of these galaxies grew exponentially, weakly depending on the stellar mass range, as a function of cosmic time with a time-scale of $τ\simeq 1.16 \pm 0.16$ Gyr for at least 4 Gyr ending around $z \simeq 0.15$. This is about a factor of ten of growth between $z=0.5$ - 0.15. Since $z \simeq 0.15$ a constant co-moving number density can be measured. According to theoretical models the most massive early-type galaxies gain most of their stellar mass via dry merging but the major merger rate measured by others cannot account for the high growth in number density we measured thus, stellar mass gain from minor mergers and slow, smooth accretion seems to play an important role. We outline a simple analytic model that explains the observed evolution based on the exponential decline of the luminosity function and sets constraints on the time dependence of the close-pair fraction of merger candidate galaxies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.