Paper detail

Explosiveness of Age-Dependent Branching Processes with Contagious and Incubation Periods

We study explosiveness of age-dependent branching processes describing the early stages of an epidemic-spread: both forward- and backward process are analysed. For the classical age-dependent branching process $(h,G)$, where the offspring has probability generating function $h$ and all individuals have life-lengths independently picked from a distribution $G$, we focus on the setting $h = h_α^L$, with $L$ a function varying slowly at infinity and $α\in (0,1)$. Here, $h^L_α(s) = 1 - (1-s)^α L(\frac{1}{1-s}),$ as $s \to 1$. For a fixed $G$, the process $(h^L_α,G)$ explodes either for all $α\in (0,1)$ or for no $α\in (0,1)$, regardless of $L$. Next, we add contagious periods to all individuals and let their offspring survive only if their life-length is smaller than the contagious period of their mother: a forward process. An explosive process $(h^L_α,G)$, as above, stays explosive when adding a non-zero contagious period. We extend this setting to backward processes with contagious periods. Further, we consider processes with incubation periods during which an individual has already contracted the disease but is not able yet to infect her acquaintances. We let these incubation periods follow a distribution $I$. In the forward process $(h^L_α,G,I)_{f}$, every individual possesses an incubation period and only her offspring with life-time larger than this period survives. In the backward process $(h^L_α,G,I)_{b}$, individuals survive only if their life-time exceeds their own incubation period. These two processes are the content of the third main result that we establish: under a mild condition on $G$ and $I$, explosiveness of both $(h,G)$ and $(h,I)$ is necessary and sufficient for processes $(h^L_α,G,I)_{f}$ and $(h^L_α,G,I)_{b}$ to explode.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.