Paper detail

Exploring the Systematic Uncertainties of Type Ia Supernovae as Cosmological Probes

We explore the systematic uncertainties of using Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) as cosmological probes, using the Supernova Legacy Survey Three Year data (SNLS3). We focus on studying the possible evolution of the stretch-luminosity parameter $α$ and the color-luminosity parameter $β$, by allowing $α$ and $β$ to be function of redshift, $z$. We find no evidence for the redshift evolution of $α$. We find that without flux-averaging SNe, $β$ is consistent with being a constant when only statistical uncertainties are included, but it increases significantly with $z$ when systematic uncertainties are also included. The evolution of $β$ becomes marginal when all the SNe are flux-averaged, and $β$ is consistent with being a constant when only SNe at $z\ge 0.04$ are flux-averaged. Our results are insensitive to the lightcurve fitter used to derive the SNLS3 sample, or the functional form of $α(z)$ and $β(z)$ assumed. It is likely that the apparent evolution of $β$ with $z$ for SNe without flux-averaging is a consequence of unknown systematic effects; flux-averaging reduces the impact of these effects by averaging them within each redshift bin. Assuming constant $α$ and $β$, we find that the flux-averaging of SNe has a significant impact on the distance-redshift relation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.