Paper detail

Exploring the role of the charm quark in the $ΔI=1/2$ rule

We study the dependence on the charm quark mass of the leading-order low-energy constants of the $ΔS=1$ effective Hamiltonian, with the aim of elucidating the role of the charm mass scale in the $ΔI=1/2$ rule for $K\toππ$ decay. To that purpose, finite-volume Chiral Perturbation Theory predictions are matched to QCD simulations, performed in the quenched approximation with overlap fermions and $m_u=m_d=m_s$. Light quark masses range between a few MeV up to around one third of the physical strange mass, while charm masses range between $m_u$ and a few hundred MeV. Novel variance reduction techniques are used to obtain a signal for penguin contractions in correlation functions involving four-fermion operators. The important role played by the subtractions required to construct renormalised amplitudes for $m_c \neq m_u$ is discussed in detail. We find evidence that the moderate enhancement of the $ΔI=1/2$ amplitude previously found in the GIM limit $m_c=m_u$ increases only slightly as $m_c$ abandons the light quark regime. Hints of a stronger enhancement for even higher values of $m_c$ are also found, but their confirmation requires a better understanding of the subtraction terms.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.