Paper detail

Exploring the Practical Limits of Cooperative Awareness in Vehicular Communications

We perform an extensive study of cooperative awareness in vehicular communication based on periodic message exchange. We start by analyzing measurements collected on four test sites across Europe. To measure cooperative awareness, we use three metrics: 1) neighborhood awareness ratio; 2) ratio of neighbors above range; and 3) packet delivery rate. Using the collected data, we define a simple model for calculating neighborhood awareness given packet delivery ratio for a given environment. Finally, we perform realistic, large-scale simulations to explore the achievable performance of cooperative awareness under realistic transmit power and transmit rate constraints. Our measurements and simulation results show that: i) above a certain threshold, there is little benefit in increasing cooperative message rate to improve the awareness; higher transmit power and fewer messages transmissions are a better approach, since message delivery is dominated by shadowing. ii) the efficacy of cooperative awareness varies greatly in different environments on both large scale (e.g., 90\% awareness is achievable up to 200~m in urban and over 500~m in highway) and small scale (e.g., vehicles in nearby streets can have significantly different awareness); iii) V2V and V2I communication have distinct awareness patterns; iv) each location has a distinct transmit power that achieves high awareness; and v) achieving high awareness levels results in increased reception of potentially unwanted messages; therefore, a balance needs to be found between awareness and interference, depending on the specific context. We hope our results will serve as a starting point for designing more effective periodic message exchange services for cooperative awareness.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.