Paper detail

Exploring the Origin of CP Violation in the Standard Model

In this article, we present a very general but not ultimate solution of CPV problem in the standard model. Our study starts from a naturally Hermitian ${\bf M^2}\equiv M^q \cdot M^{q\dagger}$ rather than the previously assumed Hermitian $M^q$. The only assumption employed here is that the real part and imaginary part of $\bf M^2$ can be, respectively, diagonalized by a common $\bf U^q$ matrix. Such an assumption leads to a $\bf M^2$ pattern which depends on only five parameters and can be diagonalized analytically by a $\bf U^q$ matrix which depends on only two of the parameters. Two of the derived mass eigenvalues are predicted degenerate if one of the parameters $\bf C ~(C')$ in up- (down-) quark sector is zero. As the $\bf U^q$ patterns are obtained, thirty-six $V_{CKM}$ candidates are yielded and only eight of them, classified into two groups, fit empirical data within the order of $O(λ)$. One of the groups is further excluded in a numerical test, and the surviving group predicts that the degenerate pair in a quark type are the lightest and the heaviest generations rather than the lighter two generations assumed in previous researches. However, there is still one unsatisfactory prediction in this research, a quadruple equality in which four CKM elements of very different values are predicted to be equal. It indicates the $\bf M^2$ pattern studied here is still oversimplified by that employed assumption and the ultimate solution can only be obtained by diagonalizing the unsimplified $\bf M^2$ matrix containing nine parameters directly. The $V_{CKM}$ presented here is already very close to such an ultimate CPV solution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.