Paper detail

Exploring the Hubble Tension and Spatial Curvature from the Ages of Old Astrophysical Objects

We use the age measurements of 114 old astrophysical objects (OAO) in the redshift range $0\lesssim z\lesssim 8$ to explore the Hubble tension. The age of the Universe at any $z$ is inversely proportional to the Hubble constant, $H_0$, so requiring the Universe to be older than the OAO it contains at any $z$ will lead to an upper limit on $H_0$. Assuming flat $Λ$CDM and setting a Gaussian prior on the matter density parameter $Ω_{\rm m}=0.315\pm0.007$ informed by {\it Planck}, we obtain a 95\% confidence-level upper limit of $H_0<70.6 \rm{~km} \rm{~s}^{-1} \rm{~Mpc}^{-1}$, representing a $2σ$ tension with the measurement using the local distance ladder. We find, however, that the inferred upper limit on $H_{0}$ depends quite sensitively on the prior for $Ω_{\rm m}$, and the Hubble tension between early-time and local measurements of $H_{0}$ may be due in part to the inference of both $Ω_{\rm m}$ and $H_0$ in {\it Planck}, while the local measurement uses only $H_{0}$. The age-redshift data may also be used for cosmological model comparisons. We find that the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ universe accounts well for the data, with a reasonable upper limit on $H_{0}$, while Einstein-de Sitter fails to pass the cosmic-age test. Finally, we present a model-independent estimate of the spatial curvature using the ages of 61 galaxies and the luminosity distances of 1,048 Pantheon Type Ia supernovae. This analysis suggests that the geometry of the Universe is marginally consistent with spatial flatness at a confidence level of $1.6σ$, characterized as $Ω_{k}=0.43^{+0.27}_{-0.27}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.