Paper detail

Exploring the evolution of color-luminosity parameter $β$ and its effects on parameter estimation

It has been found in previous studies that, for the Supernova Legacy Survey three-year (SNLS3) data, there is strong evidence for the redshift-evolution of color-luminosity parameter $β$. In this paper, using three simplest dark energy models ($Λ$CDM, $w$CDM, and CPL), we further explore the evolution of $β$ and its effects on parameter estimation. In addition to the SNLS3 data, we also take into account the Planck distance priors data, as well as the latest galaxy clustering (GC) data extracted from SDSS DR7 and BOSS. We find that, for all the models, adding a parameter of $β$ can reduce $χ^2_{min}$ by $\sim$ 36, indicating that $β_1 = 0$ is ruled out at 6$σ$ confidence levels. In other words, $β$ deviates from a constant at 6$σ$ confidence levels. This conclusion is insensitive to the dark energy models considered, showing the importance of considering the evolution of $β$ in the cosmology-fits. Furthermore, it is found that varying $β$ can significantly change the fitting results of various cosmological parameters: using the SNLS3 data alone, varying $β$ yields a larger $Ω_m$ for the $Λ$CDM model; using the SNLS3+CMB+GC data, varying $β$ yields a larger $Ω_m$ and a smaller $h$ for all the models. Moreover, we find that these results are much closer to those given by the CMB+GC data, compared to the cases of treating $β$ as a constant. This indicates that considering the evolution of $β$ is very helpful for reducing the tension between supernova and other cosmological observations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.