Paper detail

Exploring the $e^+e^-\to Λ_c^+Λ_c^-$ cross sections

A simultaneous fit is performed to the $e^+e^-\to Λ_c^+Λ_c^-$ cross section data measured by Belle and BESIII from threshold up to 5.4 GeV. In order to accommodate both the BESIII measurement near threshold and the Belle observation of a resonance $Y(4630)$, we build a composite PDF with a Breit-Wigner resonance and a continuum contribution to model the full cross section line shape of $e^+e^-\to Λ_c^+Λ_c^-$. The fit gives a mass of $M=[4636.1_{-7.2}^{+9.8} ($stat$)\pm 8.0($syst$)]$~MeV/$c^2$, a width of $Γ_{\rm tot}=[34.5_{-16.2}^{+21.0} ($stat$)\pm 5.6($syst$)]$~MeV, and $Γ_{e^+ e^-}\mathcal{B}[Y(4630)\toΛ_c^+Λ_c^-]=[18.3_{-6.1}^{+8.8} ($stat$)\pm 1.1($syst$)]$~eV/$c^2$ for the resonance. The width of $Y(4630)$ from our study is narrower than the previous Belle fit. The mass and width of $Y(4630)$ also show good agreement with a vector resonance $Y(4626)$ recently observed in $D_s^+D_{s1}(2536)^-$ by Belle.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.