Paper detail

Exploring the Dependence of Hot Jupiter Occurrence Rates on Stellar Mass with TESS

We present estimates for the occurrence rates of hot Jupiters around dwarf stars based on data from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) Prime Mission. We take 97 hot Jupiters orbiting 198,721 AFG dwarf stars (ranging in mass from $0.8M_{\odot}$ to $2.3M_{\odot}$) from an independent search for hot Jupiters using TESS Prime Mission data. We estimate our planet sample's false positive rates as $14\pm7\%$ for A stars, $16\pm6\%$ for F stars, and $0\%$ for G stars. We find hot Jupiter occurrence rates of $0.29 \pm 0.05\%$ for A stars, $0.36 \pm 0.06\%$ for F stars and $0.55 \pm 0.14\%$ for G stars, with a weighted average across AFG stars of $0.33\pm0.04\%$. Our results show a correlation between higher hot Jupiter abundance and lower stellar mass, and are in good agreement with occurrence rates found by Kepler. After correcting for the presence of binaries in the TESS stellar sample, we estimate a single-star hot Jupiter occurrence rate of $0.98\pm0.36\%$ for G stars. This is in agreement with results from radial velocity (RV) surveys, indicating that stellar multiplicity correction is able to resolve the discrepancy between hot Jupiter occurrence rates based on transits and RVs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.