Paper detail

Exploring the Correlations between Globular Cluster Populations and Supermassive Black Holes in Giant Galaxies

This paper presents an analysis of the correlation between the number of globular clusters (N_GC) in giant galaxies and the mass of the galaxies' central supermassive black hole (M_SMBH). I construct a sample of 20 elliptical, spiral, and S0 galaxies with known SMBH masses and with accurately-measured globular cluster system properties derived from wide-field imaging studies. The coefficients of the best-fitting N_GC-M_SMBH relation for the early-type galaxies are consistent with those from previous work but in some cases have smaller relative errors. I examine the correlation between N_GC and M_SMBH for various subsamples and find that elliptical galaxies show the strongest correlation while S0 and pseudobulge galaxies exhibit increased scatter. I also compare the quality of the fit of the numbers of metal-poor globular clusters versus SMBH mass and the corresponding fit for metal-rich globular clusters. I supplement the 20-galaxy sample with ten additional galaxies with reliable N_GC determinations but without measured M_SMBH. I use this larger sample to investigate correlations between N_GC and host galaxy properties like total galaxy luminosity and stellar mass and bulge luminosity and mass. I find that the tightest correlation is between N_GC and total galaxy stellar mass. This lends support to the notion that N_GC and M_SMBH are not directly linked but are correlated because both quantities depend on the host galaxy potential. Finally, I use the N_GC-M_SMBH relation derived from the 20-galaxy sample to calculate predicted M_SMBH values for the ten galaxies with accurate N_GC measurements but without measured SMBH masses.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.