Paper detail

Exploring students' backtracking behaviors in digital textbooks and its relationship to learning styles

The purpose of this study is to explore students' backtracking patterns in using a digital textbook and reveal the relationship between backtracking behaviors and academic performance as well as learning styles. The study was carried out for two semesters on 102 university students and they are required to use a digital textbook system called DITeL to review courseware. Students' backtracking behaviors are characterized by seven backtracking features extracted from interaction log data and their learning styles are measured by Felder-Silverman learning style model. The results of the study reveal that there is a subgroup of students called backtrackers who backtrack more frequently and performed better than the average students. Furthermore, the causal inference analysis reveals that a higher initial ability can directly cause a higher frequency of backtracking, thus affecting the final test score. In addition, most backtrackers are reflective and visual learners, and the seven backtracking features are good predictors in automatically identifying learning styles. Based on the results of qualitative data analysis, recommendations were made on how to provide prompt backtracking assistants and automatically detect learning styles in digital textbooks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.