Paper detail

Exploring stellar evolution models of sdB stars using MESA

Stellar evolution calculations have had great success reproducing the observed atmospheric properties of different classes of stars. Recent detections of g-mode pulsations in evolved He burning stars allow a rare comparison of their internal structure with stellar models. Asteroseismology of subdwarf B stars suggests convective cores of $0.22-0.28\,M_\odot$, $\gtrsim 45\,\%$ of the total stellar mass. Previous studies found significantly smaller convective core masses ($\lesssim 0.19\,M_\odot$) at a comparable evolutionary stage. We evolved stellar models with MESA (Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) to explore how well the interior structure inferred from asteroseismology can be reproduced by standard algorithms. Our qualitative evolutionary paths, position in the $\log g-T_{\rm{eff}}$ diagram and model timescales are consistent with previous results. SdB masses from our full evolutionary sequences fall within the range of the empirical sdB mass distribution, but are nearly always lower than the median. Using standard MLT with atomic diffusion we find convective core masses of $\sim 0.17-0.18 M_\odot$, averaged over the entire sdB lifetime. We can increase the convective core sizes to be as large as those inferred from asteroseismology, but only for extreme values of the overshoot parameter (overshoot gives numerically unstable and physically unrealistic behavior at the boundary). High resolution three-dimensional (3D) simulations of turbulent convection in stars suggest that the Schwarzschild criterion for convective mixing sytematically {\it underestimates the actual extent of mixing because a boundary layer forms.} Accounting for this would decrease the errors in both sdB total and convective core masses.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.