Paper detail

Exploring Query Categorisation for Query Expansion: A Study

The vocabulary mismatch problem is one of the important challenges facing traditional keyword-based Information Retrieval Systems. The aim of query expansion (QE) is to reduce this query-document mismatch by adding related or synonymous words or phrases to the query. Several existing query expansion algorithms have proved their merit, but they are not uniformly beneficial for all kinds of queries. Our long-term goal is to formulate methods for applying QE techniques tailored to individual queries, rather than applying the same general QE method to all queries. As an initial step, we have proposed a taxonomy of query classes (from a QE perspective) in this report. We have discussed the properties of each query class with examples. We have also discussed some QE strategies that might be effective for each query category. In future work, we intend to test the proposed techniques using standard datasets, and to explore automatic query categorisation methods.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.