Paper detail

Exploring criticality in the QCD-like two quark flavour models

The critical end-point (CEP) and critical behaviour in its vicinity, has been explored in the two flavour effective chiral models with and without the presence of effective Polyakov loop potential.The tricritical point (TCP) in the massless chiral limit has been located on the phase diagram in the μandT plane for the Polyakov loop extended Quark Meson Model (PQM) and pure Quark Meson (QM) model which become effective Quantum-chromodynamics (QCD) like models due to the proper accounting of fermionic vacuum loop contribution in the effective potential.The proximity of the TCP to the QCD critical end-point (CEP) has been quantified in the phase diagram. The critical region around CEP has been obtained in the presence as well as the absence of fermionic vacuum loop contribution in the effective potentials of PQM and QM models. The contours of appropriately normalized constant quark number susceptibility and scalar susceptibility have been plotted around CEP in different model scenarios. These contours determine the shape of critical region and facilitate comparisons in different models such that the influence of fermionic vacuum term and Polyakov loop potential on the critical behavior around CEP can be ascertained in qualitative as well as quantitative terms. Critical exponents resulting from the divergence of quark number susceptibility at the CEP,have been calulated and compared with in different model scenarios. The possible influence of TCP on the critical behavior around CEP, has also been discussed. The temperature variation of σand πmeson masses at μ= 0, μ= μ_ CEP and μ> μ_CEP has been shown and compared with in different model scenarios and the emerging mass degeneration trend in the σand πmeson mass variations has been inferred as the chiral symmetry restoration takes place at higher temperatures.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.