Paper detail

Exploratory scenarios for the differential nuclear and tidal evolution of TZ Fornacis

TZ Fornacis is a double-lined eclipsing binary system with similar masses (2.057$\pm$0.001 and 1.958$\pm$0.001 $M_{\odot}$) but characterized by very different radii (8.28$\pm$0.22 and 3.94$\pm$0.17 $R_{\odot}$). This similarity in terms of mass makes it possible to study the system's differential stellar evolution as well as some aspects of its tidal evolution. With regard to its orbital elements, it was recently confirmed that its orbit is circular with an orbital period of 75.7 days. The less massive component rotates about 17 times faster than the primary one, which is synchronized with the mean orbital angular velocity. Our main objective in this work is to study both the nuclear and the tidal evolution of the system. We explored two scenarios regarding the initial eccentricities: a high one (0.30) and a case of an initial circular orbit. A good agreement has been found between the observational values of the eccentricity, synchronism levels, and orbital period with the values predicted by the integration of the tidal evolution equations. The influence of the friction timescale on the evolution of the orbital elements of TZ For is also studied here. The orbital elements most affected by the uncertainties in the friction timescale are the synchronism levels of the two components. On the other hand, we used the properties of the rotating models generated by the GRANADA code as the initial angular velocities instead of using trial values. In this case, comparisons between the theoretical values of the orbital elements and their observed counterparts also lead to a good interagreement.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.