Paper detail

Explorations of the r-Processes: Comparisons between Calculations and Observations of Low-Metallicity Stars

Abundances of heavier elements (barium and beyond) in many neutron-capture-element-rich halo stars accurately replicate the solar system r-process pattern. However, abundances of lighter neutron-capture elements in these stars are not consistent with the solar system pattern. These comparisons suggest contributions from two distinct types of r-process synthesis events -- a so called main r-process for the elements above the 2nd r-process peak and a weak r-process for the lighter neutron-capture elements. We have performed r-process theoretical predictions to further explore the implications of the solar and stellar observations. We find that the isotopic composition of barium and the elemental Ba/Eu abundance ratios in r-process-rich low metallicity stars can only be matched by computations in which the neutron densities are in the range 23< log n_n < 28, values typical of the main r-process. For r-process conditions that successfully generate the heavy element pattern extending down to A=135, the relative abundance of I129 produced in this mass region appears to be at least 90% of the observed solar value. Finally, in the neutron number density ranges required for production of the observed solar/stellar 3rd r-process-peak (A~200), the predicted abundances of inter-peak element hafnium (Z=72, A~180) follow closely those of 3rd-peak elements and lead. Hf, observable from the ground and close in mass number to the 3rd r-process-peak elements, might also be utilized as part of a new nuclear chronometer pair, Th/Hf, for stellar age determinations.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.