Paper detail

Explorations of edge-weighted Cayley graphs and p-ary bent functions

Let f be a function mapping an n dimensional vector space over GF(p) to GF(p). When p is 2, Bernasconi et al. have shown that there is a correspondence between certain properties of f (e.g., if it is bent) and properties of its associated Cayley graph. Analogously, but much earlier, Dillon showed that f is bent if and only if the "level curves" of f had certain combinatorial properties (again, only when p is 2). The attempt is to investigate an analogous theory when p is greater than 2 using the (apparently new) combinatorial concept of a weighted partial difference set. More precisely, we try to investigate which properties of the Cayley graph of f can be characterized in terms of function-theoretic properties of f, and which function-theoretic properties of f correspond to combinatorial properties of the set of "level curves", i.e., the inverse map of f. While the natural generalizations of the Bernasconi correspondence and Dillon correspondence are not true in general, using extensive computations, we are able to determine a classification in some small cases. Our main conjecture is Conjecture 67.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.