Paper detail

Exploration of mechanical, thermal conductivity and electromechanical properties of graphene nanoribbon springs

Recent experimental advances [Liu \textit{et al., npj 2D Materials and Applications}, 2019, \textbf{3}, 23] propose the design of graphene nanoribbon spring (GNRS) to substantially enhance the stretchability of pristine graphene. GNRS is a periodic undulating graphene nanoribbon, where undulations are of sinus or half-circles or horseshoe shapes. Besides those, GNRS geometry depends on design parameters, like pitch's length and amplitude, thickness and joining angle. Because of the fact that parametric influence on the resulting physical properties are expensive and complicated to be examined experimentally, we explore the mechanical, thermal and electromechanical properties of GNRS using molecular dynamics simulations. Our results demonstrate that horseshoe shape design of GNRS (GNRH) can distinctly outperform the graphene kirigami design concerning the stretchability. The thermal conductivity of GNRS were also examined by developing a multiscale modeling, which suggests that the thermal transport along these nanostructures can be effectively tuned. We found that however, the tensile stretching of GNRS and GNRH does not yield any piezoelectric polarization. The bending induced hybridization change results in a flexoelectric polarization, where the corresponding flexoelectric coefficient is $25\%$ higher than graphene. Our results provide a comprehensive vision to the critical physical properties of GNRS and may help to employ the outstanding physics of the graphene to design novel stretchable nanodevices.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.