Paper detail

Exploration of Hamiltonian formulations of baroclinic hydrodynamics

A neutron star in a compact binary is expected to be well-approximated by a barotropic flow during the inspiral phase. During the merger phase, where tidal disruption and shock-heating occur, a baroclinic description is needed instead. In the barotropic case, a Hamiltonian formulation potentially offers unique benefits for numerical relativity simulations of the inspiral phase, including highly accurate conservation of circulation and superconvergence of the fluid variables, and is actively being explored. In this work, we investigate the viability of a Hamiltonian formulation in the baroclinic case. At odds with the barotropic case, this formulation is non-conservative, yet it can be treated well with approximate Riemann solver algorithms since the non-conservative terms vanish across genuinely nonlinear fields. Nonetheless, using numerical 1-dimensional shock tube tests we find that the weak solutions of the Hamiltonian system differ from the standard ones obtained by enforcing conservation of rest mass density, momentum density, and energy density across discontinuities. We also show that barotropic Hamiltonian formulations can admit shockwaves at fluid-vacuum interfaces, which may be related to the unstable behavior of stellar surfaces observed in past numerical tests. In light of the unphysical weak solutions, we expect that in future implementations of the Hamiltonian formulation of hydrodynamics in numerical relativity it will be necessary to use an explicitly barotropic formulation during the inspiral phase, and then switch to a robust baroclinic formulation prior to merger.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.