Paper detail

Explicit solution of the Cauchy problem for cellular automaton rule 172

Cellular automata (CA) are fully discrete alternatives to partial differential equations (PDE). For PDEs, one often considers the Cauchy problem, or initial value problem: find the solution of the PDE satisfying a given initial condition. For many PDEs of the first order in time, it is possible to find explicit formulae for the solution at the time $t>0$ if the solution is known at $t=0$. Can something similar be achieved for CA? We demonstrate that this is indeed possible in some cases, using elementary CA rule 172 as an example. We derive an explicit expression for the state of a given cell after $n$ iteration of the rule 172, assuming that states of all cells are known at $n=0$. We then show that this expression ("solution of the CA") can be used to obtain an expected value of a given cell after $n$ iterations, provided that the initial condition is drawn from a Bernoulli distribution. This can be done for both finite and infinite lattices, thus providing an interesting test case for investigating finite size effects in CA.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.