Paper detail

Explicit Non-Malleable Extractors, Multi-Source Extractors and Almost Optimal Privacy Amplification Protocols

We make progress in the following three problems: 1. Constructing optimal seeded non-malleable extractors; 2. Constructing optimal privacy amplification protocols with an active adversary, for any security parameter; 3. Constructing extractors for independent weak random sources, when the min-entropy is extremely small (i.e., near logarithmic). For the first two problems, the best known non-malleable extractors by Chattopadhyay, Goyal and Li [CGL16], and by Cohen [Coh16a,Coh16b] all require seed length and min-entropy at least $\log^2 (1/ε)$, where $ε$ is the error of the extractor. As a result, the best known explicit privacy amplification protocols with an active adversary, which achieve 2 rounds of communication and optimal entropy loss in [Li15c,CGL16], can only handle security parameter up to $s=Ω(\sqrt{k})$, where $k$ is the min-entropy of the shared secret weak random source. For larger $s$ the best known protocol with optimal entropy loss in [Li15c] requires $O(s/\sqrt{k})$ rounds of communication. In this paper we give an explicit non-malleable extractor that only requires seed length and min-entropy $\log^{1+o(1)} (n/ε)$, which also yields a 2-round privacy amplification protocol with optimal entropy loss for security parameter up to $s=k^{1-α}$ for any constant $α>0$. For the third problem, previously the best known extractor which supports the smallest min-entropy due to Li [Li13a], requires min-entropy $\log^{2+δ} n$ and uses $O(1/δ)$ sources, for any constant $δ>0$. A very recent result by Cohen and Schulman [CS16] improves this, and constructed explicit extractors that use $O(1/δ)$ sources for min-entropy $\log^{1+δ} n$, any constant $δ>0$. In this paper we further improve their result, and give an explicit extractor that uses $O(1)$ (an absolute constant) sources for min-entropy $\log^{1+o(1)} n$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.