Paper detail

Explicit Estimates for the Number of Rational Points of Singular Complete Intersections over a Finite Field

Let $V\subset\mathbb{P}^n(\overline{F}_{\hskip-0.7mm q})$ be a complete intersection defined over a finite field $F_{\hskip-0.7mm q}$ of dimension $r$ and singular locus of dimension at most $0\le s\le r-2$. We obtain an explicit version of the Hooley--Katz estimate $||V(F_{\hskip-0.7mm q})|-p_r|=\mathcal{O}(q^{(r+s+1)/2})$, where $|V(F_{\hskip-0.7mm q})|$ denotes the number of $F_{\hskip-0.7mm q}$-rational points of $V$ and $p_r:=|\mathbb{P}^r(F_{\hskip-0.7mm q})|$. Our estimate improves all the previous estimates in several important cases. Our approach relies on tools of classical algebraic geometry. A crucial ingredient is a new effective version of the Bertini smoothness theorem, namely an explicit upper bound of the degree of a proper Zariski closed subset of $(\mathbb P^{n})^{s+1}(\overline{F}_{\hskip-0.7mm q})$ which contains all the singular linear sections of $V$ of codimension $s+1$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.