Paper detail

Explicit error bounds for Markov chain Monte Carlo

We prove explicit, i.e. non-asymptotic, error bounds for Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. The problem is to compute the expectation of a function f with respect to a measure π. Different convergence properties of Markov chains imply different error bounds. For uniformly ergodic and reversible Markov chains we prove a lower and an upper error bound with respect to the L2 -norm of f . If there exists an L2 -spectral gap, which is a weaker convergence property than uniform ergodicity, then we show an upper error bound with respect to the Lp -norm of f for p > 2. Usually a burn-in period is an efficient way to tune the algorithm. We provide and justify a recipe how to choose the burn-in period. The error bounds are applied to the problem of the integration with respect to a possibly unnormalized density. More precise, we consider the integration with respect to log-concave densities and the integration over convex bodies. By the use of the Metropolis algorithm based on a ball walk and the hit-and-run algorithm it is shown that both problems are polynomial tractable.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.