Paper detail

Explicit cost bounds of stochastic Galerkin approximations for parameterized PDEs with random coefficients

This work analyzes the overall computational complexity of the stochastic Galerkin finite element method (SGFEM) for approximating the solution of parameterized elliptic partial differential equations with both affine and non-affine random coefficients. To compute the fully discrete solution, such approaches employ a Galerkin projection in both the deterministic and stochastic domains, produced here by a combination of finite elements and a global orthogonal basis, defined on an isotopic total degree index set, respectively. To account for the sparsity of the resulting system, we present a rigorous cost analysis that considers the total number of coupled finite element systems that must be simultaneously solved in the SGFEM. However, to maintain sparsity as the coefficient becomes increasingly nonlinear in the parameterization, it is necessary to also approximate the coefficient by an additional orthogonal expansion. In this case we prove a rigorous complexity estimate for the number of floating point operations (FLOPs) required per matrix-vector multiplication of the coupled system. Based on such complexity estimates we also develop explicit cost bounds in terms of FLOPs to solve the stochastic Galerkin (SG) systems to a prescribed tolerance, which are used to compare with the minimal complexity estimates of a stochastic collocation finite element method (SCFEM), shown in our previous work [16]. Finally, computational evidence complements the theoretical estimates and supports our conclusion that, in the case that the coefficient is affine, the coupled SG system can be solved more efficiently than the decoupled SC systems. However, as the coefficient becomes more nonlinear, it becomes prohibitively expensive to obtain an approximation with the SGFEM.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.