Paper detail

Explicit constructions of point sets and sequences with low discrepancy

In this article we survey recent results on the explicit construction of finite point sets and infinite sequences with optimal order of $\mathcal{L}_q$ discrepancy. In 1954 Roth proved a lower bound for the $\mathcal{L}_2$ discrepancy of finite point sets in the unit cube of arbitrary dimension. Later various authors extended Roth's result to lower bounds also for the $\mathcal{L}_q$ discrepancy and for infinite sequences. While it was known already from the early 1980s on that Roth's lower bound is best possible in the order of magnitude, it was a longstanding open question to find explicit constructions of point sets and sequences with optimal order of $\mathcal{L}_2$ discrepancy. This problem was solved by Chen and Skriganov in 2002 for finite point sets and recently by the authors of this article for infinite sequences. These constructions can also be extended to give optimal order of the $\mathcal{L}_q$ discrepancy of finite point sets for $q \in (1,\infty)$. The main aim of this article is to give an overview of these constructions and related results.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.