Paper detail

Explicit and Implicit Dynamic Coloring of Graphs with Bounded Arboricity

Graph coloring is a fundamental problem in computer science. We study the fully dynamic version of the problem in which the graph is undergoing edge insertions and deletions and we wish to maintain a vertex-coloring with small update time after each insertion and deletion. We show how to maintain an $O(α\lg n)$-coloring with polylogarithmic update time, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph and $α$ is the current arboricity of the graph. This improves upon a result by Solomon and Wein (ESA'18) who maintained an $O(α_{\max}\lg^2 n)$-coloring, where $α_{\max}$ is the maximum arboricity of the graph over all updates. Furthermore, motivated by a lower bound by Barba et al. (Algorithmica'19), we initiate the study of implicit dynamic colorings. Barba et al. showed that dynamic algorithms with polylogarithmic update time cannot maintain an $f(α)$-coloring for any function $f$ when the vertex colors are stored explicitly, i.e., for each vertex the color is stored explicitly in the memory. Previously, all dynamic algorithms maintained explicit colorings. Therefore, we propose to study implicit colorings, i.e., the data structure only needs to offer an efficient query procedure to return the color of a vertex (instead of storing its color explicitly). We provide an algorithm which breaks the lower bound and maintains an implicit $2^{O(α)}$-coloring with polylogarithmic update time. In particular, this yields the first dynamic $O(1)$-coloring for graphs with constant arboricity such as planar graphs or graphs with bounded tree-width, which is impossible using explicit colorings. We also show how to dynamically maintain a partition of the graph's edges into $O(α)$ forests with polylogarithmic update time. We believe this data structure is of independent interest and might have more applications in the future.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.