Paper detail

Explanation of the EPF experiment in terms of gravity gradients

Results of the Eötvös Pekár and Fekete (EPF) equivalence test were used by Fischbach and coworkers in 1986 as an argument in favor of a hypothetical fifth force. Although this hypothesis was abandoned in view of the negative experimental results that followed, we still miss plausible explanation of the EPF results. This situation motivated us to investigate the EPF test in terms of gravity gradients. This paper presents arguments that the results can be explained as a classical systematic effect related to the ambient gravity field. We found that gradients of the ambient gravity field caused a false equivalence violation signal. Firstly, this was due to the time variation of gravity gradients, in spite of the fact that the experimenters were aware of it and designed a method to cancel it. Second, the EPF samples had different shapes and therefore the gravitational force was necessarily different in a constant, but inhomogeneous gravity field. We demonstrate that there is an ambient gravity field where these effects can fully reproduce the EPF results.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.