Paper detail

Explanation of systematics of CMS p+Pb high multiplicity di-hadron data at $\sqrt{s}_{\rm NN} = 5.02$ TeV

In a recent article (arXiv:1210.3890), we showed that high multiplicity di-hadron proton- proton (p+p) data from the CMS experiment are in excellent agreement with computations in the Color Glass Condensate (CGC) Effective Field Theory (EFT). This agreement of the theory with several hundred data points provides a non-trivial description of both nearside ("ridge") and away-side azimuthal collimations of long range rapidity correlations in p+p collisions. Our prediction in arXiv:1210.3890 for proton-lead (p+Pb) collisions is consistent with results from the recent CMS p+Pb run at $\sqrt{s}_{\rm NN} = 5.02$ TeV for the largest track multiplicity $N_{\rm track}\sim 40$ we considered. The CMS p+Pb data shows the following striking features: i) a strong dependence of the ridge yield on $N_{\rm track}$, with a significantly larger signal than in p+p for the same $N_{\rm track}$, ii) a stronger $p_T$ dependence than in p+p for large $N_{\rm track}$, and iii) a nearside collimation for large $N_{\rm track}$ comparable to the awayside for the lower $p_T = p_{T}^{\rm trig.}=p_{T}^{\rm assoc.}$ di-hadron windows. We show here that these systematic features of the CMS p+Pb di-hadron data are all described by the CGC (with parameters fixed by the p+p data) when we extend our prediction in arXiv:1210.3890 to rarer high multiplicity events. We also predict the azimuthally collimated yield for yet unpublished windows in the $p_{T}^{\rm trig.}$ and $p_{T}^{\rm assoc.}$ matrix.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.