Paper detail

Explanation of Gravity Probe B Experimental Results using Heaviside-Maxwellian (Vector) Gravity in Flat Space-time

The Gravity Probe B (GP-B) Experiment of NASA was aimed to test the theoretical predictions of Einstein's 1916 relativistic tensor theory of gravity in curved space-time (General Relativity (GR)) concerning the spin axis precession of a gyroscope moving in the field of a slowly rotating massive body, like the Earth. In 2011, GP-B mission reported its measured data on the precession (displacement) angles of the spin axes of the four spherical gyroscopes housed in a satellite orbiting 642 km (400 mi) above the Earth in polar orbit. The reported results are in agreement with the predictions of GR. For the first time, here we report an undergraduate level explanation of the GP-B experimental results using Heaviside-Maxwellian (vector) Gravity (HMG) in flat space-time, first formulated by Heaviside in 1893, and later considered/re-discovered by many authors. Our new explanation of the GP-B results provides a new test of HMG apart from the existing ones, which deserves the attention of researchers in the field for its simplicity and new perspective.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.