Paper detail

Explaining the ttbar Forward-Backward Asymmetry from a GUT-Inspired Model

We consider a model that includes light colored scalars from the {\bf 45} and {\bf 50} representations of SU(5) in order to explain the CDF- and D$Ø$-reported $t\bar{t}$ forward-backward asymmetry, $A^{t\bar{t}}_{FB}$. These light scalars are, labeled by their charges under the Standard Model gauge groups, the $(6,1)_{4/3}$ and $(\bar{6},3)_{1/3}$ from the {\bf 50} and the $(8,2)_{1/2}$ from the {\bf 45}. When the Yukawa coupling of the {\bf 50} is reasonably chosen and that of the {\bf 45} kept negligible at the scale of $M_Z$, the model yields phenomenologically viable results in agreement with the total $A^{t\bar{t}}_{FB}$ reported by CDF at the 0.7$σ$ level and with $A^{t\bar{t}}_{FB} (M_{t\bar{t}} \ge 450 \text{GeV})$ at the 2.2$σ$ level. Additionally, the Yukawa coupling of the {\bf 50} remains perturbative to the GUT scale (which defines a "reasonably chosen" value at $M_Z$), and the presence of the light scalar from the {\bf 45} allows for gauge coupling unification at a scale of $M_{GUT} \sim 10^{17}$ GeV.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.