Paper detail

Explaining the Fermi Galactic Centre Excess in the CMSSM

We present an analysis of the compatibility between the Galactic Centre Excess (GCE) and the Constrained MSSM (CMSSM). We perform a global fit to the relevant experimental data including the GCE taking into account the systematic uncertainties. We find that the CMSSM is able to account for the GCE and maintain agreement with the other experimental searches, providing the first example that the GCE can be explained in the framework of universal supersymmetry. We map out the region compatible at 2 sigma and comment on its phenomenology. We find that for the CMSSM to explain the GCE the solution must lie close to the existing limits from LUX, IceCube and the LHC. We show that this provides definite predictions for Run 2 of the LHC, Xenon-1T and future observation with IceCube. Thus there exists the exciting possibility that the CMSSM could be observed in four distinct experimental channels over the next few years, which would be a striking signature for universal supersymmetry.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.