Paper detail

Explaining the apparent arbitrariness of the LDA-1/2 self-energy correction method applied to purely covalent systems

The LDA-1/2 method expands Slater's half occupation technique to infinite solid state materials by introducing a self-energy potential centered at the anions to cancel the energy associated with electron-hole self-interaction. To avoid an infinite summation of long-ranged self-energy potentials they must be trimmed at a variationally-defined cutoff radius. The method has been successful in predicting accurate band gaps for a large number of elementary and binary semiconductors. Nevertheless, there has been some confusion regarding carbon and silicon, both in the cubic diamond structure, which require different ionizations of the valence charge, 1/2 for carbon and 1/4 for silicon respectively, to yield band gaps in agreement with experimental data. We here analyze the spatial distribution of the valence electrons of these two materials to conclude that in silicon and in carbon LDA-1/4 and LDA-1/2, respectively, must be adopted for the proper cancellation of the self-energies. Such analysis should be applied to other covalent semiconductors in order to decide which ionization to adopt for the proper correction of the self-energy.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.