Paper detail

Explaining the AMS positron excess via Right-handed Neutrinos

We have witnessed in the past decade the observation of a puzzling cosmic-ray excess at energies larger than $10$ GeV. The AMS-02 data published this year has new ingredients such as the bump around $300$ GeV followed by a drop at $800$ GeV, as well as smaller error bars. Adopting the background used by the AMS-02 collaboration in their analysis, one can conclude that previous explanations to the new AMS-02 such as one component annihilating and decaying dark matter as well as pulsars seem to fail at reproducing the data. Here, we show that in the right-handed neutrino portal might reside the answer. We discuss a decaying two-component dark matter scenario where the two-body decay products are right-handed neutrinos that have their decay pattern governed by the type I seesaw mechanism. This setup provides a very good fit to data, for example, for a conservative approach including just statistical uncertainties leads to $χ^2/d.o.f \sim 2.3$ for $m_{DM_1}=2150$ GeV with $τ_{1}=3.78 \times 10^{26}$ s and $m_{DM_2}=300$ with $τ_{2}=5.0 \times 10^{27}$ s for $M_N=10$ GeV, and, in an optimistic case, including systematic uncertainties, we find $χ^2/d.o.f \sim 1.12$, for $M_N = 10$ GeV, with $m_{DM_1}=2200$ GeV with $τ_{1}=3.8 \times 10^{26}$ s and $m_{DM_2}=323$ GeV with $τ_{2}=1.68 \times 10^{27}$ s.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.