Paper detail

Explaining Adversarial Vulnerability with a Data Sparsity Hypothesis

Despite many proposed algorithms to provide robustness to deep learning (DL) models, DL models remain susceptible to adversarial attacks. We hypothesize that the adversarial vulnerability of DL models stems from two factors. The first factor is data sparsity which is that in the high dimensional input data space, there exist large regions outside the support of the data distribution. The second factor is the existence of many redundant parameters in the DL models. Owing to these factors, different models are able to come up with different decision boundaries with comparably high prediction accuracy. The appearance of the decision boundaries in the space outside the support of the data distribution does not affect the prediction accuracy of the model. However, it makes an important difference in the adversarial robustness of the model. We hypothesize that the ideal decision boundary is as far as possible from the support of the data distribution. In this paper, we develop a training framework to observe if DL models are able to learn such a decision boundary spanning the space around the class distributions further from the data points themselves. Semi-supervised learning was deployed during training by leveraging unlabeled data generated in the space outside the support of the data distribution. We measured adversarial robustness of the models trained using this training framework against well-known adversarial attacks and by using robustness metrics. We found that models trained using our framework, as well as other regularization methods and adversarial training support our hypothesis of data sparsity and that models trained with these methods learn to have decision boundaries more similar to the aforementioned ideal decision boundary. The code for our training framework is available at https://github.com/MahsaPaknezhad/AdversariallyRobustTraining.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.