Paper detail

Experiments on centimeter-sized dust aggregates and their implications for planetesimal formation

The first macroscopic bodies in protoplanetary disks are dust aggregates. We report on a number of experimental studies with dust aggregates formed from micron-size quartz grains. We confirm in laboratory collision experiments an earlier finding that producing macroscopic bodies by the random impact of sub-mm aggregates results in a well-defined upper-filling factor of 0.31 \pm 0.01. Compared to earlier experiments, we increase the projectile mass by about a factor of 100. The collision experiments also show that a highly porous dust-aggregate can retain its highly porous core if collisions get more energetic and a denser shell forms on top of the porous core. We measure the mechanical properties of cm-sized dust samples of different filling factors between 0.34 and 0.50. The tensile strength measured by a Brazilian test, varies between 1 kPa and 6 kPa. The sound speed is determined by a runtime measurement to range between 80 m/s and 140 m/s while Young's modulus is derived from the sound speed and varies between 7MPa and 25MPa. The samples were also subjected to quasi-static omni- and uni-directional compression todetermine their compression strengths and flow functions. Applied to planet formation, our experiments provide basic data for future simulations, explain the specific collisional outcomes observed in earlier experiments, and in general support a scenario where collisional growth of planetesimals is possible.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.