Paper detail

Experimentally Testing a Generalized Coarsening Model for Individual Bubbles in Quasi-Two-Dimensional Wet Foams

We present high-precision data for the time evolution of bubble area $A(t)$ and circularity shape parameter $C(t)$ for quasi-2d foams consisting of bubbles squashed between parallel plates. In order to fully compare with predictions by Roth et al. [Phys. Rev. E 87 2013] and Schimming et al. [Phys. Rev. E 96 2017], foam wetness is systematically varied by controlling the height of the sample above a liquid reservoir which in turn controls the radius $r$ of the inflation of the Plateau borders. For very dry foams, where the borders are very small, classic von Neumann behavior is observed where a bubble's growth rate depends only on its number $n$ of sides. For wet foams, the inflated borders impede gas exchange and cause deviations from von Neumann's law that are found to be in accord with the generalized coarsening equation. In particular, the overall growth rate varies linearly with the film height, which decrease as surface Plateau borders inflate. And, more interestingly, the deviation from $dA/dt\propto (n-6)$ von Neumann behavior grows in proportion to $nCr/\sqrt{A}$. This is highlighted definitively by data for six-sided bubbles, which are forbidden to grow or shrink except for the existence of this term. And it is tested quantitatively by variation of all four relevant quantities: $n$, $C$, $r$, and $A$

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.