Paper detail

Experimental tests of Bertrand's question and the Duhem-Quine problem

In this paper we report on an experimental test of Bertrand's question on the probability to find a random chord drawn inside a unit-radius circle with length greater than $\sqrt{3}$. In an experiment performed by tossing straws onto a circle, we confirm theoretical predictions that the answer depends on the ratio of the circle diameter, $2R$, to the straw length, $L$, and that the special case corresponding to Laplace's principle of indifference is only obtained in the experimentally unattainable limit of infinite straw length, $\tilde{d}=2R/L\rightarrow 0$. In addition, we observe a systematic discrepancy in the limit, $\tilde{d}=2R/L\rightarrow 1$, where a large number of events are rejected. We conclude that the experimental test of Bertrand's paradox provides a good illustration of the Duhem-Quine problem---that hypothesis testing is always conditional on a bundle of real auxiliary assumptions.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.