Paper detail

Experimental Study of Ethylene Evaporites under Titan Conditions

Titan has an abundance of lakes and seas, as confirmed by Cassini. Major components of these liquid bodies include methane ($CH_4$) and ethane ($C_2H_6$); however, evidence indicates that minor components such as ethylene ($C_2H_4$) may also exist in the lakes. As the lake levels drop, 5 $μm$-bright deposits, resembling evaporite deposits on earth, are left behind. Here, we provide saturation values, evaporation rates, and constraints on ethylene evaporite formation by using a Titan simulation chamber capable of reproducing Titan surface conditions (89-94 K, 1.5 bar $N_2$). Experimental samples were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, mass, and temperature readings. Ethylene evaporites form more quickly in a methane solvent than in an ethane solvent or in a mixture of methane/ethane. We measured an average evaporation rate of $(2.8 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-4} kg \; m^{-2} \; s^{-1}$ for methane and an average upper limit evaporation rate of less than $5.5 \times 10^{-6} kg \; m^{-2} \; s^{-1}$ for ethane. Additionally, we observed red shifts in ethylene absorption bands at 1.630 and 2.121 $μm$ and the persistence of a methane band at 1.666 $μm$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.