Paper detail

Experimental properties of continuously-forced, shear-driven, stratified turbulence. Part 1. Mean flows, self-organisation, turbulent fractions

We study the experimental properties of exchange flows in a stratified inclined duct (SID), which are simultaneously turbulent, strongly stratified by a mean vertical density gradient, driven by a mean vertical shear, and continuously forced by gravity. We focus on the core shear layer away from the duct walls, where these flows are excellent experimentally-realisable approximations of canonical hyperbolic-tangent stratified shear layers, whose forcing allows mean and turbulent properties to reach quasi steady states. We analyse state-of-the-art data sets of the time-resolved density and velocity in three-dimensional sub-volumes of the duct in 16 experiments covering a range of flow regimes (Holmboe waves, intermittent turbulence, full turbulence). In this Part 1 we first reveal the permissible regions in the multi-dimensional parameter space (Reynolds number, bulk Richardson number, velocity-to-density layer thickness ratio), and their link to experimentally-controllable parameters. Reynolds-averaged balances then reveal the subtle momentum forcing and dissipation mechanisms in each layer, the broadening or sharpening of the density interface, and the importance of the streamwise non-periodicity of these flows. Mean flows suggest a tendency towards self-similarity of the velocity and density profiles with increasing turbulence, and gradient Richardson number statistics support prior internal mixing theories of equilibrium Richardson number, marginal stability and self-organised criticality. Turbulent volume fractions based on enstrophy and overturn thresholds quantify the nature of turbulence between different regimes, while highlighting the challenges of obtaining representative statistics in spatio-temporally intermittent flows. These insights may stimulate and assist the development of numerical simulations with a higher degree of experimental realism.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.