Paper detail

Experimental investigations on the characteristics of snow accretion using the EMU-320 model train

This paper presents a snow accretion test conducted in a climate wind tunnel to investigate the icing process on a model train. The model used within this experiment was the cleaned-up and 2/3-scaled version of EMU-320, which is a high-speed train in Korea. The model was designed without an electronic power source or heat source so that the wheels did not rotate and snow accretion on the model did not occur due to heat sources. To investigate snow accretion, four cases with different ambient temperatures were considered in the climate wind tunnel on Rail Tec Arsenal. Before analyzing the snow accretion on the train, the snow flux and liquid water content of snow were measured so that they could be used as the input conditions for the simulation and to ensure the analysis of the icing process was based on the characteristics of the snow. Both qualitative and quantitative data were obtained, whereby photographs was used for qualitative analysis, and the density of the snow sample and the thickness of snow accreted on the model were used for quantitative analysis. Based on the visual observations, it was deduced that as the ambient temperature increased, the range of the snow accreted was broader. The thickness of snow accreted on the model nose was the largest on the upper and lower part at -3 oC, and on the middle part at -5 oC. Additionally, the cross section of snow accreted was observed to be trench-like. Similar icing processes were observed to occur on the slope of nose. Snow accreted on all components of the bogie, and for all cases, the thickness of snow at wheel was the largest at an arc angle of 40 to 70 o. These detailed data of experimental conditions can be applied as an input to simulations to improve simulations of ice conditions. Thus, they can facilitate the development of appropriate anti-icing designs for trains

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.