Paper detail

Experimental investigations of psychoacoustic characteristics of household vacuum cleaners

Vacuum cleaners are one of the most widely used household appliances associated with unpleasant noises. Previous studies have indicated the severity of vacuum cleaner noise and its impact on the users nearby. The quantified measurements of the generated noise standalone are not sufficient for the selection or designing of vacuum cleaners. The human perception must also be included for a better assessment of the quality of sound. A hybrid approach known as psychoacoustics, which comprises subjective and objective evaluations of sounds, is widely used in recent times. This paper focuses on the experimental assessment of psychoacoustical matrices for household vacuum cleaners. Three vacuum cleaners with different specifications have been selected as test candidates, and their sound qualities have been analyzed. Besides, the annoyance index has been assessed for these vacuum cleaners.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.