Paper detail

Experimental investigation of turbulent suspensions of spherical particles in a square duct

We report experimental observations of turbulent flow with spherical particles in a square duct. Three particle sizes namely: $2H/d_{p}$ = 40, 16 and 9 ($2H$ being the duct full height and $d_{p}$ being the particle diameter) are investigated. The particles are nearly neutrally-buoyant with respect to the suspending fluid. Refractive Index Matched - Particle Image Velocimetry is used for fluid velocity measurement even at the highest particle volume fraction (20%) and Particle Tracking Velocimetry for the particle velocity statistics for the flows seeded with particles of the two largest sizes, whereas only pressure measurements are reported for the smallest particles. Settling effects are seen at the lowest bulk Reynolds number $Re_{2H}\approx$ 10000 whereas, at the highest $Re_{2H}\approx$ 27000, particles are in almost full suspension. The friction factor of the suspensions is found to be significantly larger than that of single-phase duct flow at the lower $Re_{2H}$ investigated; however, the difference decreases when increasing the flow rate and the total drag approaches the values of the single phase flow at the higher Reynolds number considered. The pressure drop is found to decrease with the particle diameter for volume fractions lower than $ϕ$ = 10% for nearly all $Re_{2H}$. However, at the highest volume fraction $ϕ$ = 20%, we report a peculiar non-monotonic behavior: the pressure drop first decreases and then increases with increasing particle size. The decrease of the turbulent drag with particle size at the lowest volume fractions is related to an attenuation of the turbulence. The drag increase for the two largest particle sizes at $ϕ$ = 20%, however, occurs despite this large reduction of the turbulent stresses, and it is therefore due to significant particle-induced stresses.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.