Paper detail

Experimental investigation of the turbulent Schmidt number in supersonic film cooling with shock interaction

The interaction of an impinging shock and a supersonic helium cooling film is investigated experimentally by high-speed particle-image velocimetry. A laminar helium jet is tangentially injected into a turbulent air freestream at a freestream Mach number $Ma_\infty=2.45$. The helium cooling film is injected at a Mach number $Ma_i=1.30$ at a total temperature ratio $T_{0,i}/T_{0,\infty}=0.75$. A deflection $β=8°$ generates a shock that impinges upon the cooling film. A shock interaction case and a reference case without shock interaction are considered. The helium mass fraction fluctuations are measured and the turbulent mass flux as well as the turbulent Schmidt number are determined qualitatively. For comparison, large-eddy simulation (LES) results of a comparable flow configuration are used. The streamwise and wall-normal turbulent mass fluxes are in qualitative agreement with the LES data. The turbulent Schmidt number differs significantly from unity. Without shock interaction, the turbulent Schmidt number is in the range $0.5 \leq Sc_t \leq 1.5$ which is in agreement with the literature. With shock interaction, the turbulent Schmidt number varies drastically in the vicinity of the shock interaction. Thus, the experimental results confirm the numerical data showing a massively varying turbulent Schmidt number in supersonic film cooling flows, i.e., the standard assumption of a constant turbulent Schmidt number is valid neither without nor with shock interaction.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.